Room Acoustics and Speech Perception

The acoustic speech signal received by a listener is a function of the source, distance, early reverberation, late reverberation, and noise. Specifically, it depends on the speech audibility index, which is defined here as the proportion of the combined direct speech and early reverberation (also known as early reflections) that is audible in spite of the effects of noise and late reverberation. The speech audibility index increases from 0 to 100% as the effective signal-to-noise ratio increases from -15 to +15 dB. Both reverberation and ambient noise need to be low to maintain the speech audibility index at an optimal level. The speech audibility index can be used to predict various measures of speech perception, but the results are highly dependent on the complexity of the language and the characteristics of the listener. Conditions that are tolerable for normally hearing adults in casual conversation can be difficult for adults and children in learning situations, and intolerable for persons with deficits of hearing, language, attention, or processing. Sound-field amplification can improve the speech audibility index for all listeners in a noisy room. It offers less benefit when the primary problem is reverberation and, if improperly installed, can make the reverberation problem worse. There is no good substitute for reverberation control. Audiologists have an important contribution to make in the identification and resolution of continuing inadequacies of classroom acoustics.

Classroom acoustics - room acoustics - speech perception - reverberation - sound-field amplification - FM amplification

REFERENCES

• 1 Cox R M, Moore J R. Composite speech spectrum for hearing aid gain prescriptions.  J Speech Hear Res. 1988;  31 102-107
• 2 Boothroyd A, Erickson F, Medwetsky L. The hearing aid input: a phonemic approach to assessing the spectral distribution of speech.  Ear Hear. 1994;  15 432-442
• 3 Davis D, Davis C. Sound System Engineering, 2nd ed. Newton, MA; Focal Press 1997
• 4 Peutz V. Speech recognition and information. In: Davis D, Davis C Sound System Engineering, 2nd ed. Newton, MA; Focal Press 1997: 639-644
• 5 French N R, Steinberg J C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1947;  19 90-119
• 6 Fletcher H. Speech and Hearing in Communication. New York; Van Nostrand Available in the ASA edition, edited by Jont Allen 1953 Melville, NY; Acoustical Society of America 1995
• 7 American National Standard method for measuring the intelligibility of speech over communication systems. ANSI S3.2-1989 (R1995). Washington, DC; American National Standards Institute 1995
• 8 American National Standard methods of the calculation of the speech intelligibility index. ANSI S3.5-1997. Washington, DC; American National Standards Institute 1997
• 9 Steeneken H JM, Houtgast T. The modulation transfer function in room acoustics as a predictor of speech intelligibility.  Acustica. 1973;  28 66-73
• 10 Mackersie C L, Boothroyd A, Minnear D. Evaluation of the Computer-Assisted Speech Perception Test (CASPA).  J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;  12 390-396
• 11 Boothroyd A. Evaluation of speech production in the hearing-impaired: some benefits of forced-choice testing.  J Speech Hear Res. 1985;  28 185-196
• 12 Boothroyd A, Nittrouer S. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;  84 101-114
• 13 Boothroyd A. Influence of context on the perception of spoken language. In: Proc. Congreso Internacional de Foniatría, Audiología, Logopedia y Psicología del lenguaje Salamanca, Spain; Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca 2002
• 14 Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineural hearing loss.  J Speech Hear Res. 1984;  27 134-144
• 15 American National Standards Institute .Acoustical performance criteria, design requirements, and guidelines for classrooms. ANSI S12.6-2002. 2002
• 16 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association . Acoustics in educational settings: position statement and guidelines.  ASHA. 1995;  37(suppl 14) 15-19
• 17 Guidelines for Fitting and Monitoring FM Systems. In: ASHA Desk Reference. Vol. II. Rockville, MD; American Speech-Language Hearing Association 2002: 151-171
• 18 Crandell C C, Smaldino J J. Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Schools. 2000;  31 362-370